Martin,
unfortunately our 3-dimensional world is fueled (and greased) by the money.
I really don't see any technical problems with this set - up.
Ideally it should be 2 generators running at 50 % rated load - looks
very redundant.
So the actual obstacle is the regulation. I probably will end up g
At least do it for a better reason than the money.
Of course, you don't take in to account generator failure and the cost
of connecting (IF 'they' will even let you connect)
--
--
Martin Klingensmith
http://infoarchive.net/
alex wrote:
>Paul,
>I'm more concerned at this point at making some
Paul,
I'm more concerned at this point at making some reasonable return on
investment.
And it doesn't look that bad : 24litres X 24 hours = 576 litres/day.
576 X 365 = 210 000 litres/1 year - output from 200 acres.
100 kwt X 24 X 365 X .08(c/KWTH) = $ 70,080.00.
Not a bad income for a farmer. Plu
Good point. Remember as well that most electric power needs falls in
two spikes, AM and PM rush. If you can run a generator for a few hours
in the AM and PM then that's really all you'd need to decrease
consumption during spike times, let alone run your farms on it. I know
little of the spe
