Uh, I think I'll go with Tom Clements. Both he and the Nuclear
Control Institute have a long history and a good track record in
these matters. Whereas you, Marc, have not exactly covered yourself
in glory defending matters nuclear here. Last time your main
authority was some 30-year-old book,
Right on Marc. An authority is worth no more than the arguments they
present!!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
UhhhMarc?
Getting a bit snotty and disrespectful of the conservative preferences of
others here, aren't we?
Whatever happened to including all research, rather than selective research?
And when dealing with cataclysmic events, you fault others for being
cautious?
This is unadulterated
Uh, I think I'll go with Tom Clements. Both he and the Nuclear
Control Institute have a long history and a good track record in
these matters. Whereas you, Marc, have not exactly covered yourself
in glory defending matters nuclear here. Last time your main
authority was some 30-year-old book,
