jerry dycus wrote:
> Hi Keith and All,
>If Chuck is this rude again we should axe him.
>It's uncalled for.
> I disagree with Pedro too but would never be as
>disrespectful as Chuck.
> jerry dycus
>--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's a con job. Are you alwa
Hi Keith and All,
If Chuck is this rude again we should axe him.
It's uncalled for.
I disagree with Pedro too but would never be as
disrespectful as Chuck.
jerry dycus
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a con job. Are you always going to be stupid?
> -
and so on ) will can kill my voice.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Why biofuels ???
> It's a con job. Are you always going to be stupid?
> - Original Message -
It's a con job. Are you always going to be stupid?
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:18 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Why biofuels ???
> It has just been created nuclear-fossil-dangers in
> http://groups.yah
It has just been created nuclear-fossil-dangers in
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nuclear-fossil-dangers where we can send post
about the new energy politics and their dangers, like a base for an
alternative answer : the biofuels, biodiesel and renowable energy.
A place for deep questions ;)
All
