Re: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola

2005-03-17 Thread D. Mindock
articles over the last few years, you will see that he's forthright and sincere. Any claim that he makes can be backed up with real science. He is not rigid in his opinions and if a recent valid study shows he's wrong he's the first to admit it. He constantly emphasizes the primacy of diet ver

RE: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola

2005-03-17 Thread Dan Volker
And those who oppose Mercola typically prefer the company of the money grubbing whores in the Pharmaceutical industry-- a group specializing in treating symptoms, and avoiding finding cures which could drastically reduce profits. A group which is also responsible for pushing the medical community

Re: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola

2005-03-17 Thread John Hayes
I trust Dr Mercola far more than I do the FDA. If you have been reading his articles over the last few years, you will see that he's forthright and sincere. Any claim that he makes can be backed up with real science. *snort* Pull the other one. "Real science", as you put it, requires a) sy

RE: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola

2005-03-17 Thread Dan Volker
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola D. Mindock wrote: > I trust Dr Mercola far more than I do the FDA. If you have been > reading his articles over the last few years, you will see that he's > forthright and sincere. A

Re: [Biofuel] Dr Mercola

2005-03-18 Thread bob allen
observations is that is all they are. Regardless of flaws in individual studies, overall I trust double blind studies , published in peer reviewed journals. Science is essentially a self correcting process. If one observes a result that can not be reproduced, the the result doesn't stand.