RE: [biofuel] Gas vs diesel Was: SUV question - Silk Purses out of Sows Ears

2003-02-26 Thread Martin
I have been _very_ interested in 2-cycle diesels because of their high power/weight ratio. The concern was that they "smoke too much" but modern designs eliminate a lot of the soot, and clean fuels of course reduce emissions immensely. I want to design a small two cycle diesel, but as fate would h

Re: [biofuel] Gas vs diesel Was: SUV question - Silk Purses out of Sows Ears

2003-02-26 Thread Jean-Leon Morin
> They're turbocharged two-cycle, probably > Or maybe Detroit only makes two-cycle, but to get the most power large > engines like that are generally some sort of forced [or "slightly > persuaded"] induction. The detroit diesel 2 stroke engine actually requires a supercharger by design. The exha

RE: [biofuel] Gas vs diesel Was: SUV question - Silk Purses out of Sows Ears

2003-02-26 Thread Martin Klingensmith
> -Original Message- > From: kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:59 PM > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [biofuel] Gas vs diesel Was: SUV question - Silk Purses out > of Sows Ears > > Caterpillar makes some low compression

RE: [biofuel] Gas vs diesel Was: SUV question - Silk Purses out of Sows Ears

2003-02-26 Thread kirk
Caterpillar makes some low compression diesels for the railroad. They won't start below +40F without preheat. Low compression means less efficiency too. Don't know why they use such low compression. Kirk -Original Message- From: csakima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February