You are correct. It was late when I read that. Sorry for my thick
headedness.
Bill C.
- Original Message -
From: "murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: [mdiaircar] Nuremberg
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:43:01 -0600, you wrote:
>I think the thing to take from the discussion of O2 increases being
>dangerous should be that any rapid (geologically) changes in the composition
>of the air are dangerous to species which have adapted to specific
>conditions over long periods. CO2 i
Message -
From: "murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: [mdiaircar] Nuremberg Inventor's Fair
> >>I don't know if this theory is born out, but I also think of this when
> >>I see Oxyge
>Just for CO/CO2. You need something like the X-ray workers wear, that
>bleeps cheerfully when it's time to go spend a few centuries in your
>corpsicle tank till things improve somewhat.
>
>It needs to read the stuff behind the increasingly regular
>announcements in ever more cities cancelling
>>I don't know if this theory is born out, but I also think of this when
>>I see Oxygen percentages not even discussed or measured commonly.
>
>Similar to your thoughts on hydrogen. I'd also like to know the answer to this.
>
>I've seen the release of O2 into the Earth's atmosphere described as
>
>All boils down to transducers and instrumentation doesn't it?
>1% answers are considered pretty good.
>Cheap and accurate are at odds with each other.
>
>Some interesting transducers measured sound velocity and it changes with
>mix.
>I think they were looking for a reliable CO2 guage for greenhou
All boils down to transducers and instrumentation doesn't it?
1% answers are considered pretty good.
Cheap and accurate are at odds with each other.
Some interesting transducers measured sound velocity and it changes with
mix.
I think they were looking for a reliable CO2 guage for greenhouse plan
