RE: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation

2003-05-23 Thread kirk
nt: Friday, May 23, 2003 1:22 AM To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation The idea that "let's cut down all of the forest to protect the forest from itself" is BS and the timber industry may have Greg and others convinced that is the thing to do, b

RE: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation

2003-05-23 Thread Mark Kaufman
ems for the last 2.5 million years or so, without the so-called help from Big-Timber. Mak -Original Message- From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 1:32 PM To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation Hello Greg >Ke

Re: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation

2003-05-22 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Greg >Keith, > >should over growen forest, be thined? I don't think there's any disagreement about that. >If so, what should be done with the wood from the thinning? You're putting the cart before the horse Greg - you're not going to demonstrate that "therefore let Big Timber do it"

Re: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation

2003-05-22 Thread Greg
Keith, should over growen forest, be thined? If so, what should be done with the wood from the thinning? Greg H. ---Original Message--- From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 05/21/03 02:29 PM To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Re: [biofuel] Fire Mitigation > htt