#x27; section.
RG> as the roadmap hasnt been
RG> updated for a while?
Yeah okay, now I am back from Japan I will get on it.
RG>_
RG> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RG> Sent: 15 September 2004 15:22
RG> To: ABQJoe
RG> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RG> Su
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 7:19:05 PM, kgordon wrote:
kdc> I think the guys at canon are the only ones working on it, for printer
kdc> drivers.
Printer drivers that take SVG and rasterise at high res for print, or
printer drivers that generate SVG (from other inputs) for an SVG
printer?
Whats the latest with the SVG 1.2 spec then as the roadmap hasnt been
updated for a while?
_
From: Chris Lilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2004 15:22
To: ABQJoe
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [svg-developers] SVG Print specification update?
On Tuesday
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 6:56:32 PM, ABQJoe wrote:
A> Does anyone know if there has been any further development of the w3c
A> SVG Printing specification project?
A> Latest update I find is from 2/19/2003.
Yes, sorry about that. It was waiting for the SVG 1.2 spec to settle
down.
We hav
I think the guys at canon are the only ones working on it, for printer
drivers.
From: ABQJoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [svg-developers] SVG Print specification update?
Does anyone
Does anyone know if there has been any further development of the w3c
SVG Printing specification project?
Latest update I find is from 2/19/2003.
If anyone has any info about new dev or abandoning the project, I'd
appreciate it.
In advance, thanks
Joe
Yahoo! Group
6 matches
Mail list logo
