Author: davidxu
Date: Fri Aug 20 23:51:34 2010
New Revision: 211534
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211534
Log:
make sure thread lock is locked.
Modified:
head/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c
Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c
Author: jhb
Date: Fri Aug 20 20:58:57 2010
New Revision: 211533
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211533
Log:
Revert 210173 as it did not properly fix the bug. It assumed that the
VI_LOCK() for a given vnode was used as the internal interlock for that
vnode's v_lock lockmgr lock.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-08-20 00:20, Bruce Evans wrote:
These seem to be needed, and some of them valid. Any lvalue arg that
can be put in a register can be cast to USItype (unsigned int) on i386.
The args are macro args, so they may have any integer type no larger
t
Author: jhb
Date: Fri Aug 20 20:33:13 2010
New Revision: 211532
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211532
Log:
MFC: Use VN_LOCK_AREC() and VN_LOCK_ASHARE() rather than manipulating
lockmgr lock flags directly.
Modified:
stable/7/sys/fs/nwfs/nwfs_node.c
stable/7/sys/fs/pseudofs/pse
Author: jhb
Date: Fri Aug 20 19:46:50 2010
New Revision: 211531
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211531
Log:
Add dedicated routines to toggle lockmgr flags such as LK_NOSHARE and
LK_CANRECURSE after a lock is created. Use them to implement macros that
otherwise manipulated the fla
"M. Warner Losh" writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> > > And we're back to the reason for why issetugid() :)
> > Does setuid() "untaint" a program?
> No.
Yet I would argue that it is safe to apply the user's .login_conf after
setuid(), so issetugid() is not an a
In message: <86bp8xf5u6@ds4.des.no>
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" writes:
: > And we're back to the reason for why issetugid() :)
:
: Does setuid() "untaint" a program?
No.
Warner
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing l
"M. Warner Losh" writes:
> And we're back to the reason for why issetugid() :)
Does setuid() "untaint" a program?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
T
In message: <861v9ty7bg@ds4.des.no>
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
: Attilio Rao writes:
: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
: > > Perhaps the test in setusercontext() should be changed to use
: > > geteuid() instead of getuid().
: > Yes, I think that it probabilly makes more sense (get
On 20 August 2010 21:52, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Author: ume
> Date: Fri Aug 20 17:52:49 2010
> New Revision: 211530
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211530
>
> Log:
> optp may be NULL.
>
> Modified:
> head/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c
>
> Modified: head/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c
> ==
Author: ume
Date: Fri Aug 20 17:52:49 2010
New Revision: 211530
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211530
Log:
optp may be NULL.
Modified:
head/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c
Modified: head/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c
==
Author: mjacob
Date: Fri Aug 20 17:20:05 2010
New Revision: 211529
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211529
Log:
Revert r211434. Offline discussions have convinced me that this should
be left alone for now.
Modified:
head/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c
Modified: head/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.
Author: bz
Date: Fri Aug 20 15:26:09 2010
New Revision: 211527
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211527
Log:
MFC r25:
MFp4 CH180235:
Add proto spacers to inet6sw like we have for legacy IP. This allows us
to dynamically pf_proto_register() for INET6 from modules, n
Author: davidxu
Date: Fri Aug 20 13:42:48 2010
New Revision: 211526
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211526
Log:
Reduce redundant code.
Submitted by: kib
Modified:
head/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c
Modified: head/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c
=
Author: bz
Date: Fri Aug 20 12:26:02 2010
New Revision: 211525
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211525
Log:
MFC r25:
MFp4 CH180235:
Add proto spacers to inet6sw like we have for legacy IP. This allows us
to dynamically pf_proto_register() for INET6 from modules, n
Attilio Rao writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Perhaps the test in setusercontext() should be changed to use
> > geteuid() instead of getuid().
> Yes, I think that it probabilly makes more sense (geteuid() testing in
> setusercontext()).
What if the user's ~/.login_conf sets a custom PATH
16 matches
Mail list logo