.
Is this something that was considered?
- Pieter de Goeje
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I didn't include these results below.
Assuming I've done my work correctly, you should be able to just drop in
the code above. :-)
Regards,
Pieter de Goeje
1 random keys
=
_overflow().
--
Pieter de Goeje
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sunday 29 May 2011 05:01:57 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Pieter de Goeje pie...@degoeje.nl wrote:
To me it looks like it's not able to cache the zeroes anymore. Is this
intentional? I tried to change ZERO_REGION_SIZE back to 64K but that
didn't help.
Hmm
is installed. This processor has 6MB of L3 cache.
To me it looks like it's not able to cache the zeroes anymore. Is this
intentional? I tried to change ZERO_REGION_SIZE back to 64K but that didn't
help.
Regards,
Pieter de Goeje
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org
in a loop results in a
running time of 3 seconds with kern.hz=100 (measured on 8.x from Dec 9th),
which is 3 times as long as one might reasonably expect. This suggests that
the callout fires 2 ticks late ...
- Pieter de Goeje
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 16:46:07 Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 15:46:35 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:18:42PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Together
