On 12 May 2009, at 20:16, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 04:18 am, Doug Rabson wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 09:16, Kip Macy wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson
wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 06:03, Kip Macy wrote:
Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs.
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 04:18 am, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 12 May 2009, at 09:16, Kip Macy wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson
wrote:
> >> On 12 May 2009, at 06:03, Kip Macy wrote:
> >>> Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs. 64-bit
> >>> for xdr
> >>> whereas
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Frank Behrens wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> > I thought that XDR 'long' types were 32 bit regardless of whether the
>> > platform was 32 or 64 bit. I'll have to read the code again.
>
> XDR is defined in RFC 4506. It should be in
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > I thought that XDR 'long' types were 32 bit regardless of whether the
> > platform was 32 or 64 bit. I'll have to read the code again.
XDR is defined in RFC 4506. It should be independent from
architecture.
"An XDR {signed,unsigned} inte
On 12 May 2009, at 09:16, Kip Macy wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 06:03, Kip Macy wrote:
Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs. 64-bit for
xdr
whereas in the kernel, Solaris is not.
I thought that XDR 'long' types were 32
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2009, at 06:03, Kip Macy wrote:
>
>> Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs. 64-bit for xdr
>> whereas in the kernel, Solaris is not.
>
> I thought that XDR 'long' types were 32 bit regardless of whether the
> platf
On 12 May 2009, at 06:03, Kip Macy wrote:
Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs. 64-bit for xdr
whereas in the kernel, Solaris is not.
I thought that XDR 'long' types were 32 bit regardless of whether the
platform was 32 or 64 bit. I'll have to read the code again.
__
Here is the problem, FreeBSD is sloppy about 32-bit vs. 64-bit for xdr
whereas in the kernel, Solaris is not.
Solaris:
bool_t
xdr_int(XDR *xdrs, int *ip)
{
if (xdrs->x_op == XDR_ENCODE)
return (XDR_PUTINT32(xdrs, ip));
if (xdrs->x_op == XDR_DECODE)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
> The XDR support code that is in the main kernel should have a very similar
> API to the opensolaris bits, possibly identical. Perhaps the opensolaris
> compat could use the main kernel's XDR implementation?
I tried that. The label reads end u
The XDR support code that is in the main kernel should have a very
similar API to the opensolaris bits, possibly identical. Perhaps the
opensolaris compat could use the main kernel's XDR implementation?
On 11 May 2009, at 05:18, Kip Macy wrote:
Author: kmacy
Date: Mon May 11 04:18:58 2009
N
10 matches
Mail list logo
