Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:35:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: >> >> * Ed Maste wrote: >> >> > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect.

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-23 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:35:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > >> * Ed Maste wrote: > >> > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect. We do want > >> > it to become a panic, b

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/23/10, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: >> * Ed Maste wrote: >> > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect. We do want >> > it to become a panic, but I would prefer to hold off until we address >> > the known issue with

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-23 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Ed Maste wrote: > > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect. We do want > > it to become a panic, but I would prefer to hold off until we address > > the known issue with padlock(4). > > I have seen this message

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-23 Thread Ed Schouten
* Ed Maste wrote: > I was just about to follow up with a comment to that effect. We do want > it to become a panic, but I would prefer to hold off until we address > the known issue with padlock(4). I have seen this message appear when using the ndisulator as well. How are we going to solve it i

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-22 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:49:36AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 22 March 2010 7:52:54 am Ed Maste wrote: > > Author: emaste > > Date: Mon Mar 22 11:52:53 2010 > > New Revision: 205444 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205444 > > > > Log: > > Merge r197455 from amd64: > >

Re: svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 22 March 2010 7:52:54 am Ed Maste wrote: > Author: emaste > Date: Mon Mar 22 11:52:53 2010 > New Revision: 205444 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205444 > > Log: > Merge r197455 from amd64: > > Add a backtrace to the "fpudna in kernel mode!" case, to help track down

svn commit: r205444 - head/sys/i386/i386

2010-03-22 Thread Ed Maste
Author: emaste Date: Mon Mar 22 11:52:53 2010 New Revision: 205444 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205444 Log: Merge r197455 from amd64: Add a backtrace to the "fpudna in kernel mode!" case, to help track down where this comes from. Reviewed by:bde Modified: