On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
Author: davidxu
Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
New Revision: 213241
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213241
Log:
In current code, statically initialized and destroyed object have
same null value, the code can not
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:02 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
Author: davidxu
Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:02 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
Author: davidxu
Date: Tue Sep 28
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, David Xu wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
[ snip ]
Unfortunately, it seems to have a regression:
%cat test.c
#include pthread.h
#include stdio.h
static pthread_cond_t static_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
static
Author: davidxu
Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
New Revision: 213241
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213241
Log:
In current code, statically initialized and destroyed object have
same null value, the code can not distinguish between them, to
fix the problem, now a destroyed object
