On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Glen Barber wrote:
How is either one of these different ?
All mv(1) is doing is a cp(1) & rm(1). In either case the filehandle is
still broken and a process is not going to just get up and move with it. On
the other side though if you copied a pipe or socket or something
On 7/28/11 12:52 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> This is not always true when the source and destination live on the
>> same filesystem. See rename(2).
>> Via VOP_RENAME, individual filesystems can override this behavior if
>> needed (e.g. for AFS where permissions are per-directory, so a
>> cross-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 7/27/11 10:19 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> +.Sh NOTES +Great care should be taken when managing directories
>> visible within the jail. +For example, if a jailed process has its
>> current working directory set to a +directory that is moved out
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:56:52AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Author: gjb (doc committer)
>> Date: Wed Jul 27 01:56:52 2011
>> New Revision: 224462
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/224462
>>
>> Log:
>> MFC 224286:
>>
Author: gjb (doc committer)
Date: Wed Jul 27 01:56:52 2011
New Revision: 224462
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/224462
Log:
MFC 224286:
Document the potential for jail escape.
PR: 142341
Modified:
stable/8/usr.sbin/jail/jail.8
Directory Properties:
stable/8/us
