Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:52:17AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > > I have Audigy2ZS (model SB0350) in my table if any help with testing > > needed, but I've never looked into emu10k code, preferring to hack more > > widespread and documente

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 01/04/12 16:25, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >> --- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev  ha scritto: >> ... The only issue is getting rid of the remaining >>> >>> (small) GPL'd headers. Alternatively this driver is already >>> >>>

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Alexander Motin
On 01/04/12 16:25, Pedro Giffuni wrote: --- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: ... The only issue is getting rid of the remaining (small) GPL'd headers. Alternatively this driver is already available as a port (audio/emu10kx). Yes, I am aware of the port existence. My point was to

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: ... > > The only issue is getting rid of the remaining > (small) > > GPL'd headers. Alternatively this driver is already > available > > as a port (audio/emu10kx). > > Yes, I am aware of the port existence.  My point was > to leave just one, BSD lice

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:58:10AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > --- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: > > How hard would it be to (re)implement missing features with > > emu10k1 and nuke GPL-polluted emu10kx? > > The emu10kx started from the emu10k1 and is mostly BSD licensed, > I did sta

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; --- Mer 4/1/12, Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: ... > > How hard would it be to (re)implement missing features with > emu10k1 and nuke GPL-polluted emu10kx? > The emu10kx started from the emu10k1 and is mostly BSD licensed, I did start cleaning it in kern/153901 but I didn't commit the th

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:54:53AM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote: > The emu10k1 and emu10kx drivers essentially support the same hardware, with > a few exceptions (if memory serves me right -- I think there are a few cards > that emu10kx does not support, someone should check with Yuriy). However, > emu10

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-04 Thread Joel Dahl
On 03-01-2012 16:15, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:04:54 pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > Author: pfg > > Date: Tue Jan 3 21:04:54 2012 > > New Revision: 229430 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229430 > > > > Log: > > Replace a GPL'd header in the emu10k1 snd

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > --- Mar 3/1/12, Garrett Cooper ha scritto: > ... >> >> Can the same be done for emu10kx ? >> > No :(. The two extra headers are GPL'd and the author doesn't > want to hear about BSDs. > >> Someday it would be nice to have xfi support in t

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Mar 3/1/12, Garrett Cooper ha scritto: ... > > Can the same be done for emu10kx ? > No :(. The two extra headers are GPL'd and the author doesn't want to hear about BSDs. > Someday it would be nice to have xfi support in the tree, > but that's a missing driver that even the OSS maintainer

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; --- Mar 3/1/12, John Baldwin ha scritto: ... > On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:04:54 > pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > Author: pfg > > Date: Tue Jan  3 21:04:54 2012 > > New Revision: 229430 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229430 > > > > Log: > >   Replace a GPL'd header in the

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi; > > --- Mar 3/1/12, John Baldwin ha scritto: > ... >> On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:04:54 >> pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: >> > Author: pfg >> > Date: Tue Jan  3 21:04:54 2012 >> > New Revision: 229430 >> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/chang

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi John, * John Baldwin , 20120103 22:15: > Is this a common-enough chipset to enable in GENERIC now that it is safe to > do so? I would guess so, especially on i386 boxes. -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgppMQr3sEwZr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:04:54 pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Author: pfg > Date: Tue Jan 3 21:04:54 2012 > New Revision: 229430 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229430 > > Log: > Replace a GPL'd header in the emu10k1 snd driver code. > > This brings in the emuxkireg.h from

svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1

2012-01-03 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Author: pfg Date: Tue Jan 3 21:04:54 2012 New Revision: 229430 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229430 Log: Replace a GPL'd header in the emu10k1 snd driver code. This brings in the emuxkireg.h from NetBSD (dev/pci) which is used for the same purpose but is smaller. The emu10k1