On May 16, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/05/16, at 2:02, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
>> I don't object, but I'm not sure why we need this.
>>
>> I'd rather see a comment in the BEAGLEBONE
>> config indicating that it can be used with
>> beaglebone-black.dts.
>>
>> Generally, I want u
.. if there were only a way we could glue together different elf
binaries into some kind of "archive" that let people load a set of
modules as part of a kernel.
We could call it initrd (ew) or something.
adrian
On 17 May 2013 05:45, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On May 16, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Rui
On May 16, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/05/16, at 2:02, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
>> I don't object, but I'm not sure why we need this.
>>
>> I'd rather see a comment in the BEAGLEBONE
>> config indicating that it can be used with
>> beaglebone-black.dts.
>>
>> Generally, I want u
On 2013/05/16, at 2:02, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I don't object, but I'm not sure why we need this.
>
> I'd rather see a comment in the BEAGLEBONE
> config indicating that it can be used with
> beaglebone-black.dts.
>
> Generally, I want us to move away from compiled-in
> DTBs. The BEAGLEBONE co
I don't object, but I'm not sure why we need this.
I'd rather see a comment in the BEAGLEBONE
config indicating that it can be used with
beaglebone-black.dts.
Generally, I want us to move away from compiled-in
DTBs. The BEAGLEBONE config works just fine on either
one and it's what I plan to con
Author: rpaulo
Date: Thu May 16 03:51:00 2013
New Revision: 250692
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250692
Log:
Add a kernel config file for the BeableBone Black SoC.
Added:
head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE-BLACK (contents, props changed)
Added: head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE-BLACK
