On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:55:51PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Odd, this reads like one of those things that's better off being
time-capped, rather than packet-count capped.
this is in fact how it works: the control loop in the polling
code dynamically adjusts the actual number of packets so
Author: luigi
Date: Wed May 22 16:32:18 2013
New Revision: 250911
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250911
Log:
Increase the (arbitrary) limit for the number of packets per tick
from 1k to 20k The previous value was good 10 years ago, but not
anymore now.
More importantly,
Odd, this reads like one of those things that's better off being
time-capped, rather than packet-count capped.
Good find, though.
Adrian
On 22 May 2013 09:32, Luigi Rizzo lu...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: luigi
Date: Wed May 22 16:32:18 2013
New Revision: 250911
URL:
