On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:21:39AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:30:09AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > @@ -791,6 +791,8 @@ fill_kinfo_proc_only(struct proc *p, struct kinfo_proc
> > *kp)
> > struct ucred *cred;
> > struct sigacts *ps;
> >
> > + /* For
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:30:09AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> @@ -791,6 +791,8 @@ fill_kinfo_proc_only(struct proc *p, struct kinfo_proc
> *kp)
> struct ucred *cred;
> struct sigacts *ps;
>
> + /* For proc_realparent. */
> + sx_assert(&proctree_lock, SX_LOCKED);
> PR
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:59:03PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > So how about the following:
>
> You need to update kinfo_proc32 in sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h
> and freebsd32_kinfo_proc_out() in kern/kern_proc.c. Other
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> So how about the following:
You need to update kinfo_proc32 in sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h
and freebsd32_kinfo_proc_out() in kern/kern_proc.c. Otherwise,
32bit kinfo_proc is broken, in particular, you can see 32 bit
ps(1) dumpi
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 5:55:22 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:23:10PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:32:10 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
> > > > On Monday, August 2
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:55:22AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:23:10PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:32:10 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
> > > > On Monday, Augus
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:23:10PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:32:10 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
> > > On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:30:34 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > > John Baldwin wrote this
On 8/26/2014 4:23 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:32:10 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>> John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
>>> On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:30:34 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
John Baldwin wrote this message on Mon, Aug 25, 2
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:32:10 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
> > On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:30:34 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > John Baldwin wrote this message on Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 13:35 -0400:
> > > > On Monday, Augus
John Baldwin wrote this message on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 15:09 -0400:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:30:34 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > John Baldwin wrote this message on Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 13:35 -0400:
> > > On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 201
On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:30:34 pm John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote this message on Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 13:35 -0400:
> > On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, August 24, 2014
On Monday, August 25, 2014 9:28:16 pm Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:35:58PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:35:58PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09 AM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > Author: mjg
> > > > Date: Sun Aug 2
John Baldwin wrote this message on Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 13:35 -0400:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09 AM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > Author: mjg
> > > > Date: Su
On Monday, August 25, 2014 07:02:41 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09 AM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > Author: mjg
> > > Date: Sun Aug 24 09:04:09 2014
> > > New Revision: 270444
> > > URL: http://svnweb.free
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:23:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09 AM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > Author: mjg
> > Date: Sun Aug 24 09:04:09 2014
> > New Revision: 270444
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270444
> >
> > Log:
> > Fix getppid for traced
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 09:04:09 AM Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Author: mjg
> Date: Sun Aug 24 09:04:09 2014
> New Revision: 270444
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270444
>
> Log:
> Fix getppid for traced processes.
>
> Traced processes always have the tracer set as the parent.
Author: mjg
Date: Sun Aug 24 09:04:09 2014
New Revision: 270444
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270444
Log:
Fix getppid for traced processes.
Traced processes always have the tracer set as the parent.
Utilize proc_realparent to obtain the right process when needed.
Revi
18 matches
Mail list logo