On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0500, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 2015-02-09 05:46, Glen Barber wrote:
> >Author: gjb
> >Date: Mon Feb 9 10:46:39 2015
> >New Revision: 278450
> >URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278450
> >
> >Log:
> > Revert r278445.
> >
> > I was going to use _
On 2015-02-09 05:46, Glen Barber wrote:
Author: gjb
Date: Mon Feb 9 10:46:39 2015
New Revision: 278450
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278450
Log:
Revert r278445.
I was going to use __FreeBSD_version to determine if
xz(1) should be multi-threaded by default, but doing
th
On Feb 9, 2015, at 08:50, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> ... this is why we should have some kind of version identifier in each
> tool, or capability lists. Otherwise lulz will ensue like this.
Well, we have: xz --version will output a version string that should be easy to
parse.
--
Rui Paulo
___
... this is why we should have some kind of version identifier in each
tool, or capability lists. Otherwise lulz will ensue like this.
-adrian
On 9 February 2015 at 08:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 02:46, Glen Barber wrote:
>>
>> Author: gjb
>> Date: Mon Feb 9 10:46:39 2015
>> Ne
On Feb 9, 2015, at 02:46, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> Author: gjb
> Date: Mon Feb 9 10:46:39 2015
> New Revision: 278450
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278450
>
> Log:
> Revert r278445.
>
> I was going to use __FreeBSD_version to determine if
> xz(1) should be multi-threaded by
Author: gjb
Date: Mon Feb 9 10:46:39 2015
New Revision: 278450
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278450
Log:
Revert r278445.
I was going to use __FreeBSD_version to determine if
xz(1) should be multi-threaded by default, but doing
this will cause problems if/when the chang
