On Thu, 28 May 2015, Brooks Davis wrote:
Log:
Revert r102953
The bitfile padding was always unallocated on real-world FreeBSD systems and
depended on the assumption that (abs(sizeof(long) - sizeof(char*)) = 32).
Actually, it was bit-field padding that depended on the assumption that
On Fri, 29 May 2015, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:40:16PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Brooks Davis wrote:
Log:
Revert r102953
The bitfile padding was always unallocated on real-world FreeBSD systems and
depended on the assumption that
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:40:16PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Brooks Davis wrote:
Log:
Revert r102953
The bitfile padding was always unallocated on real-world FreeBSD systems
and
depended on the assumption that (abs(sizeof(long) - sizeof(char*)) = 32).
Author: brooks
Date: Thu May 28 22:06:05 2015
New Revision: 283671
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/283671
Log:
Revert r102953
The bitfile padding was always unallocated on real-world FreeBSD systems and
depended on the assumption that (abs(sizeof(long) - sizeof(char*)) =