On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:57:03 -0800
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I think this was mostly shared with kan's MIPS work on the CI20 as the
>> IPI stuff via the gic is effectively the same.
>>
>> Can we make this (again) something we c
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:57:03 -0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi,
>
> I think this was mostly shared with kan's MIPS work on the CI20 as the
> IPI stuff via the gic is effectively the same.
>
> Can we make this (again) something we can share, but optionally?
>
>
Nope, mips shares no IPI code with
hi,
I think this was mostly shared with kan's MIPS work on the CI20 as the
IPI stuff via the gic is effectively the same.
Can we make this (again) something we can share, but optionally?
-a
On 27 February 2016 at 04:03, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> Author: skra
> Date: Sat Feb 27 12:03:07 2016
>
Author: skra
Date: Sat Feb 27 12:03:07 2016
New Revision: 296138
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296138
Log:
Move IPI related parts back to (ARM) machine specific file now, when
the interrupt framework is also going to be used by another (MIPS)
architecture. IPI implementation
