> On May 6, 2017, at 11:43, Mahdi Mokhtari wrote:
>
> Also I think it worths saying, I've tested this running on a X86.
> It was not panic'd and printed data as expected.
> So you mean it's possible to panic on "some" cases because of CPUID support?
You'll get a hardware trap if/when the CPU do
Also I think it worths saying, I've tested this running on a X86.
It was not panic'd and printed data as expected.
So you mean it's possible to panic on "some" cases because of CPUID support?
--
Best regards, MMokhi.
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing
> Executing CPUID instruction on i386 without checking for CPUID support
> panics the kernel.
Thanks for hint.
you mean I should first check if this platform supports 0x8006 CPUID
command or not?
--
Best regards, MMokhi.
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 05:37:01PM +, Mahdi Mokhtari wrote:
> + do_cpuid(0x8006, cache_size);
Executing CPUID instruction on i386 without checking for CPUID support
panics the kernel. Also, it is worth ensuring that the requested leaf is
supported, otherwise nonsensical data would be p
Author: mmokhi (ports committer)
Date: Sat May 6 17:37:01 2017
New Revision: 317884
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317884
Log:
Fix linprocfs_docpuinfo() output regarding to what newer Linux apps expect
Reviewed by: trasz
Approved by: trasz
MFC after:2 weeks
Diff
