Konstantin Belousov wrote:
[stuff snipped]
>I wrote:
>>
>> The patches in PR#205193 change nfsuserd to use a local socket,
>> which fixes this problem. However, the original poster of the PR had
>> hangs when using the patches which was never resolved (I couldn't
>> reproduce the hang).
>So conside
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:58:56AM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Well, I know nothing about jails, so I can't answer either of these.
> All I can tell you is that 127.0.0.1 no longer works as localhost when
> jails are run for some situations which I don't understand and that
> breaks the nfsuserd u
Bezüglich Rick Macklem's Nachricht vom 05.07.2017 13:58 (localtime):
> Well, I know nothing about jails, so I can't answer either of these.
> All I can tell you is that 127.0.0.1 no longer works as localhost when
> jails are run for some situations which I don't understand and that
> breaks the nf
uck until someone can test the patches? rick
From: Olivier Cochard-Labbé
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:10:28 AM
To: Rick Macklem
Cc: svn-src-head; svn-src-all; src-committers; Konstantin Belousov
Subject: Re: svn commit: r320659 - head/usr.sbin/nfsuserd
O
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:20:30PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > +Since the kernel communicates with the
> > +.Nm
> > +daemon via an upcall that uses the IP address 127.0.0.1, it does not
> work correctly when
> > +.Xr jail 8
> > +are
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:20:30PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
> +Since the kernel communicates with the
> +.Nm
> +daemon via an upcall that uses the IP address 127.0.0.1, it does not work
> correctly when
> +.Xr jail 8
> +are used and can crash the system.
Does it indeed break when jails are used
Author: rmacklem
Date: Tue Jul 4 22:20:30 2017
New Revision: 320659
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320659
Log:
Add a Bugs section that indicates that the nfsuserd doesn't work
when jails are being used on the system.
It is hoped that the patches in PR#205193 will someday get