>> +++ head/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018(r337536)
>> @@ -3271,9 +3271,11 @@ ipfw_delete(char *av[])
>> exitval = do_cmd(IP_FW_NAT_DEL, &i, sizeof i);
>> if (exitval) {
>> exitval = EX_UNAVAILABLE;
>> -
On 09.08.2018 20:32, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> [ text/html is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
> Can you resend in none html format please?
Yes, sorry, I was AFK and tried to send via mobile phone..
-f options means "force", with -f ipfw(8) will not ask any questions and
forcibly execute t
[ text/html is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
Can you resend in none html format please?
> 19:50, 9 ?? 2018 ??., "Rodney W. Grimes"
> :-- Start of PGP
> signed section.[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] />??On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rod
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 10:01 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 09:49 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 09:49 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > >
> > > On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > table add/delete commands had the
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 09:49 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> >
> > On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > table add/delete commands had the same behavior, "nat
-- Start of PGP signed section.
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> table add/delete commands had the same behavior, "nat" already noted in
> this list. What is the usage scenario do you use, where you need to fail
> on bad de
On 09.08.2018 19:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
table add/delete commands had the same behavior, "nat" already noted in
this list. What is the usage scenario do you use, where you need to fail
on bad delete?
>>>
>>> if [ ipfw delete ${1} ]; then
>>> handle the missing rule
>>> fi
>>
> On 09.08.2018 18:48, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >>> This now means -q has 2 functions, silence most commands,
> >>> and silently ignore errors on delete.
> >>>
> >>> That is a poor implementation of syntax and options.
> >>
> >> I think it makes "delete" command to have the same behavior as descri
On 09.08.2018 18:48, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>> This now means -q has 2 functions, silence most commands,
>>> and silently ignore errors on delete.
>>>
>>> That is a poor implementation of syntax and options.
>>
>> I think it makes "delete" command to have the same behavior as described
>> for com
> On 09.08.2018 17:40, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >>> So now I can not code a quiet ipfw command that does fail when
> >>> I give it a bad delete command :-(.
> >>
> >> Previously -q did not handled by delete command, so you can just use bad
> >> "ipfw delete" without -q :)
> >
> > This now means -
On 09.08.2018 17:40, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>> So now I can not code a quiet ipfw command that does fail when
>>> I give it a bad delete command :-(.
>>
>> Previously -q did not handled by delete command, so you can just use bad
>> "ipfw delete" without -q :)
>
> This now means -q has 2 function
-- Start of PGP signed section.
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 09.08.2018 17:28, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >> Author: ae
> >> Date: Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018
> >> New Revision: 337536
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337536
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> If -q flag is sp
On 09.08.2018 17:28, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> Author: ae
>> Date: Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018
>> New Revision: 337536
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337536
>>
>> Log:
>> If -q flag is specified, do not complain when we are trying to delete
>> nonexistent NAT instance or nonexi
> Author: ae
> Date: Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018
> New Revision: 337536
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337536
>
> Log:
> If -q flag is specified, do not complain when we are trying to delete
> nonexistent NAT instance or nonexistent rule.
It would probably be better to not over
Author: ae
Date: Thu Aug 9 12:46:30 2018
New Revision: 337536
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337536
Log:
If -q flag is specified, do not complain when we are trying to delete
nonexistent NAT instance or nonexistent rule.
This allows execute batched `delete` commands and d
17 matches
Mail list logo