Thanks for the fixes and sorry for the breakage.
While others might work on more proper fixes. Does it make sense to
have the attached patch to fix riscv* build?
BTW, ${LINKER_TYPE} == "bfd" seems causing failure in the clean stage,
that's why it didn't be caught in my test and CI, they have
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:19 PM Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Yes, such a table would be extremely helpful. :)
>
Yes. Committed. Great idea. Committed with some verbage about which one to
use to.
Warner
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
I write:
> jhb writes:
>
>> With PC-98 removed, I don't think we have any cases where MACHINE !=
>> MACHINE_CPUARCH now?
>>
>
> Well, there's arm64 / aarch64.
>
And riscv / riscv64.
Warner
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:19 PM Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2019, at 01:44, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On 11/20/19 3:42 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >> On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> ...
> >> You can however find more of these elsewhere:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:32 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> On 11/20/19 3:04 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/20/19 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:54 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >>>
> Author: lwhsu
>
On 21 Nov 2019, at 01:44, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 11/20/19 3:42 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
...
>> You can however find more of these elsewhere:
>>
>> ../lib/libc/tests/sys/Makefile:.if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} != "aarch64" &&
>> ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} !=
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 04:44:58PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 11/20/19 3:42 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > Hijacking a side-thread:
> >
> > PreS: I think we have way too many of these options and should just
> > remove 3/4 of them again
On 11/20/19 3:42 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Hijacking a side-thread:
>
> PreS: I think we have way too many of these options and should just
> remove 3/4 of them again or someone build a proper matrix documenting
> them all and in which case
On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
Hijacking a side-thread:
PreS: I think we have way too many of these options and should just
remove 3/4 of them again or someone build a proper matrix documenting
them all and in which case to use in the developers handbook ;-)
This one also
On 11/20/19 3:04 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/19 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:54 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>>>
Author: lwhsu
Date: Wed Nov 20 16:54:21 2019
New Revision: 354900
URL:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> On 11/20/19 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:54 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >
> >> Author: lwhsu
> >> Date: Wed Nov 20 16:54:21 2019
> >> New Revision: 354900
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354900
>
On 11/20/19 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:54 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
>> Author: lwhsu
>> Date: Wed Nov 20 16:54:21 2019
>> New Revision: 354900
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354900
>>
>> Log:
>> Use the correct variable, also limit the scope to bfd
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:54 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> Author: lwhsu
> Date: Wed Nov 20 16:54:21 2019
> New Revision: 354900
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354900
>
> Log:
> Use the correct variable, also limit the scope to bfd
>
> PR: 242109
> Reported by: jhb
>
Author: lwhsu
Date: Wed Nov 20 16:54:21 2019
New Revision: 354900
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354900
Log:
Use the correct variable, also limit the scope to bfd
PR: 242109
Reported by: jhb
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Modified:
14 matches
Mail list logo
