> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:19 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:12:40PM +, Colin Percival wrote:
> > > Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
> >
> > I also appreciate it.
> >
>
> You bet. I had enough people send me dispassionate context around to
> realize that
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 03:03:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:19 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > ...
> > Please, just open a DR for that so all interested parties can participate
> > and fine-tune particular grammar and language choices. Also, r362447
> > should be
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:19 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:12:40PM +, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
>
> I also appreciate it.
>
You bet. I had enough people send me dispassionate context around to
realize that minion was no longer a
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:19:35PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> ...
> Please, just open a DR for that so all interested parties can participate
> and fine-tune particular grammar and language choices. Also, r362447
> should be reverted on the same grounds as r362422.
Perhaps full backout is
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:12:40PM +, Colin Percival wrote:
> Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
I also appreciate it.
> I'd like to change "slave" to "worker" here (which I think is a reasonably
> neutral and entirely inoffensive term), and in the process perhaps make some
> associated
... never mind, it looks like Conrad got here first with r362447.
On 2020-06-20 13:12, Colin Percival wrote:
> Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
>
> I'd like to change "slave" to "worker" here (which I think is a reasonably
> neutral and entirely inoffensive term), and in the process perhaps
Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
I'd like to change "slave" to "worker" here (which I think is a reasonably
neutral and entirely inoffensive term), and in the process perhaps make some
associated grammatical changes (since "enworker" is dubious at best).
To avoid causing any further issues:
Author: imp
Date: Sat Jun 20 20:06:14 2020
New Revision: 362444
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362444
Log:
Revert -r362422.
While whimsical, there's too much negative energy around minion as well as the
positive.
Modified:
head/sbin/dump/tape.c
Modified: