Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Am 04.11.20 um 20:49 schrieb Konstantin Belousov: On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:51:12PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 02.11.20 um 23:10 schrieb Konstantin Belousov: On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Am 04.11.20 um 20:40 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:04:37AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: For 25 years PREFIX has been rigidly a part of the ports infustructure, why is it that the BASE system has been allowed to de-evolve from this concept as documented and REQUIRED

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:51:12PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.11.20 um 23:10 schrieb Konstantin Belousov: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > > > support LOCALBASE being different

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:04:37AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Picking a late message in this thread to reply to > > [ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ] > > >>>I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > > >>> support LOCALBASE being different

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Picking a late message in this thread to reply to [ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ] > >>>I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > >>> support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local > >> > >> The big majority of users will keep the default

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local The big majority of users will keep the default value, and I do not see a good reason for a change, except if there is a large installed base that traditionally uses another

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Am 02.11.20 um 23:10 schrieb Konstantin Belousov: On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local I honestly don't see any advantages of making it

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:32:14 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:22:15PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:10:39 +0200 > > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > I think that

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 23:24:34 +0100 Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.11.20 um 22:49 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:41:38 +0100 > > Stefan Esser wrote: > > > >> Am 02.11.20 um 20:20 schrieb Oliver Pinter:> On Monday, November 2, > >> 2020, Stefan Eßer >>> >

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:22:15PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:10:39 +0200 > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > > > support LOCALBASE

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Am 02.11.20 um 22:49 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:41:38 +0100 Stefan Esser wrote: Am 02.11.20 um 20:20 schrieb Oliver Pinter:> On Monday, November 2, 2020, Stefan Eßer > wrote: Author: se Date: Mon Nov  2 18:48:06 2020 New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:10:39 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > > support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local > > I honestly don't see any advantages of

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local > I honestly don't see any advantages of making it !=/usr/local/ and > before we start putting a lot of

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:41:38 +0100 Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.11.20 um 20:20 schrieb Oliver Pinter:> On Monday, November 2, > 2020, Stefan Eßer > > wrote: > > > > Author: se > > Date: Mon Nov  2 18:48:06 2020 > > New Revision: 367280 > > URL:

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Am 02.11.20 um 20:20 schrieb Oliver Pinter:> On Monday, November 2, 2020, Stefan Eßer > wrote: Author: se Date: Mon Nov  2 18:48:06 2020 New Revision: 367280 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367280

Re: svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

On Monday, November 2, 2020, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Author: se > Date: Mon Nov 2 18:48:06 2020 > New Revision: 367280 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367280 > > Log: > Re-arrange some of the code to separate writable user tree variables from > R/O variables. > > While here

svn commit: r367280 - head/lib/libc/gen

Author: se Date: Mon Nov 2 18:48:06 2020 New Revision: 367280 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367280 Log: Re-arrange some of the code to separate writable user tree variables from R/O variables. While here fix some nearby style. No functional change intended. MFC