Author: marcel
Date: Sat Jun 12 01:45:29 2010
New Revision: 209085
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209085
Log:
The ptc.g operation for the Mckinley and Madison processors has the
side-effect of purging more than the requested translation. While
this is not a problem in general, it
Author: jkim
Date: Fri Jun 11 23:38:25 2010
New Revision: 209082
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209082
Log:
Apply band-aid around function-like macro fdrop() without turning it into
a real (inline) function or applying void casting for all its consumers.
In most of places, the "r
Author: delphij
Date: Fri Jun 11 22:29:49 2010
New Revision: 209078
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209078
Log:
Detect bit endianness through machine/endian.h. This fixes xz on big-endian
systems.
Tested on:sparc64 (kindly provided by linimon), amd64
Modified:
head/lib/
Author: cperciva
Date: Fri Jun 11 21:46:45 2010
New Revision: 209072
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209072
Log:
Clean up code by removing pre-C99 struct hack preprocessor magic.
Approved by: randi (maintainer)
Modified:
head/usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.h
Modified: head/u
Author: jfv
Date: Fri Jun 11 21:35:19 2010
New Revision: 209071
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209071
Log:
Put back the lost bus_describe_intr() calls.
Modified:
head/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c
LOL, I'm sorry John, I actually did put them into my local source, I dont
know what happened, just not my day :(
Jack
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2010 4:54:27 pm Jack F Vogel wrote:
> > Author: jfv
> > Date: Fri Jun 11 20:54:27 2010
> > New Revision
On Friday 11 June 2010 4:54:27 pm Jack F Vogel wrote:
> Author: jfv
> Date: Fri Jun 11 20:54:27 2010
> New Revision: 209068
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209068
>
> Log:
> Add a couple fixes from Michael Tuexen.
> Remove unneeded rxtx handler, make que handler generic.
> Do no
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> Odd though, because that code is in the driver on a system with 16 cores and
> I'm
Author: jfv
Date: Fri Jun 11 20:59:29 2010
New Revision: 209070
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209070
Log:
Change the mbuf memory calls back to NOWAIT as a
problem has been seen in one case with doing the
M_WAITOK
Modified:
head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/ix
Author: randi
Date: Fri Jun 11 20:56:40 2010
New Revision: 209069
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209069
Log:
Make sysinstall WARNS=2 clean.
Approved by: cperciva (mentor)
MFC after:1 month
Modified:
head/usr.sbin/sysinstall/Makefile
head/usr.sbin/sysinstall/install.c
Author: jfv
Date: Fri Jun 11 20:54:27 2010
New Revision: 209068
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209068
Log:
Add a couple fixes from Michael Tuexen.
Remove unneeded rxtx handler, make que handler generic.
Do not allocate header mbufs in rx ring if not doing hdr split.
Release the
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> Odd though, because that code is in the driver on a system with 16 cores
>>> and
>>> I'm
>>> not hearing about any problem from my test
OK, that's kinda what I was guessing... Damn, guess I'll have to change it
back.
Thanks for letting me know.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> Odd though, because that code is in the driver on a system with 16 cores
>> an
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
Odd though, because that code is in the driver on a system with 16 cores and
I'm
not hearing about any problem from my test engineer.
So this makes it all go away:
--- //depot/user/bz/vimage/src/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c2010-06-09
07:53:30.0 000
Odd though, because that code is in the driver on a system with 16 cores and
I'm
not hearing about any problem from my test engineer.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> HM, I put in a change in response to som
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
Hi,
HM, I put in a change in response to some people having problems with
mbuf resources, it seemed to work ok, but now i'm kinda concerned. Does
this
happen every time you bring the device up?
In the routine 'ixgbe_setup_receive_ring()' I changed a
Author: jkim
Date: Fri Jun 11 20:08:20 2010
New Revision: 209066
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209066
Log:
Fix one more case where a string is passed via format argument instead.
Found by: clang
Modified:
head/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_asus.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/acpi
HM, I put in a change in response to some people having problems with
mbuf resources, it seemed to work ok, but now i'm kinda concerned. Does
this
happen every time you bring the device up?
In the routine 'ixgbe_setup_receive_ring()' I changed a couple of
M_NOWAIT's
to M_WAITOK, thinking tha
Author: jkim
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:58:41 2010
New Revision: 209065
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209065
Log:
Simplify a function for getting brightness levels.
Modified:
head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_video.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_video.c
===
Author: jkim
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:53:42 2010
New Revision: 209064
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209064
Log:
Remove unused assignment.
Found by: clang static analyzer
Found by: Coverity Prevent[tm] (CID 4537, 4538, 4539)
Modified:
head/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_fujit
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Jack F Vogel wrote:
Author: jfv
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:03:59 2010
New Revision: 209060
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209060
Log:
Remove a disable_queue from the beginning of the
interrupt handler, automask handles it.
Also, add in msix vector descriptions.
MF
Author: mlaier
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:35:05 2010
New Revision: 209063
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209063
Log:
Cache the last result from if_indextoname for printing. This speeds up
"arp -an" when using a lot of aliases (on a single interface).
A better fix would include a bet
Author: avg
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:27:21 2010
New Revision: 209062
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209062
Log:
fix a few cases where a string is passed via format argument instead of
via %s
Most of the cases looked harmless, but this is done for the sake of
correctness. In one
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Log:
ffs_softdep: change K&R in function defintions to ANSI prototypes
Apparently it's bad when we first have an ANSI prototype in function
declaration, but then use K&R in its defintion.
No, it's bad when the prototype doesn't match the definition.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:49:14AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pyu
Author: jfv
Date: Fri Jun 11 19:03:59 2010
New Revision: 209060
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209060
Log:
Remove a disable_queue from the beginning of the
interrupt handler, automask handles it.
Also, add in msix vector descriptions.
MFC for 8.1 asap
Modified:
head/sys/d
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:49:14AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not clear w
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip
>> supports 64bit addresses w
Author: jhb
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:46:34 2010
New Revision: 209059
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209059
Log:
Update several places that iterate over CPUs to use CPU_FOREACH().
Modified:
head/sys/amd64/acpica/madt.c
head/sys/amd64/amd64/legacy.c
head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/
Author: brucec
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:43:55 2010
New Revision: 209058
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209058
Log:
sctp_recvmsg returns the number of bytes received, not sent.
Approved by: rrs (mentor)
MFC after:1 month
Modified:
head/lib/libc/net/sctp_recvmsg.3
Modified:
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:20:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip
>> supports 64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment restrictions.
>>
>
> Some cont
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:20:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2010 1:50:16 pm Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > > On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:37:36AM -0600, Scott L
Author: avg
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:26:53 2010
New Revision: 209057
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209057
Log:
ffs_softdep: change K&R in function defintions to ANSI prototypes
Apparently it's bad when we first have an ANSI prototype in function
declaration, but then use K&R in it
On Friday 11 June 2010 1:50:16 pm Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:37:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote
Author: avg
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:20:56 2010
New Revision: 209056
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209056
Log:
vnode.h: expand debug macros to non-empty void statements when
DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS is disabled
MFC after:2 weeks
Modified:
head/sys/sys/vnode.h
Modified: head/sys/sys
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:55:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
Author: jkim
Date: Fri Jun 11 18:19:23 2010
New Revision: 209055
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209055
Log:
Fix a possible dereference of null pointer.
Found by: clang static analyzer
Found by: Coverity Prevent[tm] (CID 3423)
Modified:
head/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi
On 6/11/10 6:43 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 11 June 2010 8:41:49 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:10:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 11 June 2010 4:31:37 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
Author: mav
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
>
> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip
> supports 64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment restrictions.
>
> >>>
>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip supports
64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment restrictions.
>>>
>>> Some controllers have 4G boundary bug so bge(4) restricts dma
>>> address space
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:55:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Scott Long wrote:
I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip supports
>>> 64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment rest
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:37:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip supports
>> 64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment restrictions.
>
> As per:
>/*
> * All contro
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> I'm not clear why you even need bounce buffers for RX. The chip supports
> 64bit addresses with no boundary or alignment restrictions.
As per:
/*
* All controllers that are not 5755 or higher have 4GB
* boundary DMA
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:37:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:37:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Author: ma
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:21:24AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
On Friday 11 June 2010 1:04:36 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> > On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >>> Author: marcel
> >>> Date: Fri Jun 11 03:00:32 2010
> >>> New
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Author: marcel
Date: Fri Jun 11 03:00:32 2010
New Revision
On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>> Author: marcel
>>> Date: Fri Jun 11 03:00:32 2010
>>> New Revision: 209026
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209026
>>
On Friday 11 June 2010 11:56:18 am John Baldwin wrote:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Fri Jun 11 15:56:18 2010
> New Revision: 209050
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209050
>
> Log:
> Add helper macros to iterate over available CPUs in the system.
> CPU_FOREACH(i) iterates over the CPU IDs
Author: mdf
Date: Fri Jun 11 17:03:26 2010
New Revision: 209053
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209053
Log:
Add INVARIANTS checking that numfreebufs values are sane. Also add a
per-buf flag to catch if a buf is double-counted in the free count.
This code was useful to debug an in
Author: uqs
Date: Fri Jun 11 17:03:04 2010
New Revision: 209052
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209052
Log:
Remove dead variable assignments
Found by: clang static analyzer
Verified by: md5(1)
Modified:
head/sbin/ccdconfig/ccdconfig.c
head/sbin/gbde/gbde.c
head/sbin
Author: uqs
Date: Fri Jun 11 17:02:57 2010
New Revision: 209051
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209051
Log:
Initialize variables before usage.
Found by: clang static analyzer
Found by: Coverity Prevent[tm] (CID 7736, 7760)
Modified:
head/sbin/camcontrol/modeedit.c
On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> Author: marcel
>> Date: Fri Jun 11 03:00:32 2010
>> New Revision: 209026
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209026
>>
>> Log:
>> Bump MAX_BPAGES from 256 to 1024. It seems
Author: jhb
Date: Fri Jun 11 15:56:18 2010
New Revision: 209050
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209050
Log:
Add helper macros to iterate over available CPUs in the system.
CPU_FOREACH(i) iterates over the CPU IDs of all available CPUs. The
CPU_FIRST() and CPU_NEXT(i) macros can a
Author: alc
Date: Fri Jun 11 15:49:39 2010
New Revision: 209048
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209048
Log:
Relax one of the new assertions in pmap_enter() a little. Specifically,
allow pmap_enter() to be performed on an unmanaged page that doesn't have
VPO_BUSY set. Having VPO_
On Friday 11 June 2010 8:41:49 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:10:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday 11 June 2010 4:31:37 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > Author: mav
> > > > Date: Thu Jun 10 1
Author: ashish (ports committer)
Date: Fri Jun 11 12:58:29 2010
New Revision: 209039
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209039
Log:
Add myself to the committers graph.
Approved by: pgj (mentor)
Modified:
head/share/misc/committers-ports.dot
Modified: head/share/misc/committers-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:10:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2010 4:31:37 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > Author: mav
> > > Date: Thu Jun 10 16:14:05 2010
> > > New Revision: 208988
> > > URL: http://svn.freeb
On Friday 11 June 2010 4:31:37 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Author: mav
> > Date: Thu Jun 10 16:14:05 2010
> > New Revision: 208988
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208988
> >
> > Log:
> > Store interrupt trap fram
On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:00:33 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Author: marcel
> Date: Fri Jun 11 03:00:32 2010
> New Revision: 209026
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209026
>
> Log:
> Bump MAX_BPAGES from 256 to 1024. It seems that a few drivers, bge(4)
> in particular, do not han
Author: ivoras
Date: Fri Jun 11 09:27:33 2010
New Revision: 209037
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209037
Log:
In another move to join with the age of the Fruitbat, increase SYSV
shared resources defaults beyond absolute minimums.
The new values are chosen mostly by magic. They
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:09:43PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Author: mav
> >> Date: Thu Jun 10 16:14:05 2010
> >> New Revision: 208988
> >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208988
> >>
>
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Author: mav
>> Date: Thu Jun 10 16:14:05 2010
>> New Revision: 208988
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208988
>>
>> Log:
>> Store interrupt trap frame into struct thread. It allows interrupt
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:14:05PM +, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Author: mav
> Date: Thu Jun 10 16:14:05 2010
> New Revision: 208988
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208988
>
> Log:
> Store interrupt trap frame into struct thread. It allows interrupt handler
> to obtain both trap
On 11 Jun 2010, at 02:32, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> Author: avatar
> Date: Fri Jun 11 01:32:42 2010
> New Revision: 209022
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209022
>
> Log:
> Fixing compilation bustage by adding the missing && back.
>
> Modified:
> head/sys/net80211/ieee80211_sta.c
>
71 matches
Mail list logo
