Author: rpaulo
Date: Sat Jul 12 07:46:18 2014
New Revision: 268565
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268565
Log:
Remove bsd.dtrace.mk.
MFC after:3 weeks
Modified:
head/share/mk/Makefile
Modified: head/share/mk/Makefile
Author: theraven
Date: Sat Jul 12 07:47:50 2014
New Revision: 268566
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268566
Log:
Turn off exceptions and rtti when building the c++ version of users.
Neither is used in the program and this saves us 10KB (around 40%) in binary
size.
Modified:
On 10 Jul 2014, at 16:29, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
With the patch above, the binary shrinks to 15640 bytes, so my
concerns are somewhat addressed. :-)
I wasn't seeing that saving, but I've now committed a tweak to the Makefile
that turns off exceptions and RTTI. This shrinks the
Author: jilles
Date: Sat Jul 12 10:27:30 2014
New Revision: 268568
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268568
Log:
sh: Consistently treat ${01} like $1.
Leading zeroes were ignored when checking whether a positional parameter is
set, but not when expanding its value. Ignore
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, David Chisnall wrote:
Log:
Turn off exceptions and rtti when building the c++ version of users.
Neither is used in the program and this saves us 10KB (around 40%) in binary
size.
This joke is bad. The C++ version is worse in every way.
Source code:
It becomes smaller
On 12/07/2014 12:34, Bruce Evans wrote:
This joke is bad. The C++ version is worse in every way.
I concur with everything you have said in your message. Moral of story:
it is very, very easy to introduce bloat using C++, and using a higher
level language does not automatically lead to
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 18:48 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Jul 11, 2014, at 18:42, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 01:04 +, Rui Paulo wrote:
Author: rpaulo
Date: Sat Jul 12 01:04:10 2014
New Revision: 268543
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268543
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:37:49PM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 12/07/2014 12:34, Bruce Evans wrote:
This joke is bad. The C++ version is worse in every way.
I concur with everything you have said in your message. Moral of story: it
is very, very easy to introduce bloat using C++, and
Author: pfg
Date: Sat Jul 12 15:19:30 2014
New Revision: 268569
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268569
Log:
strfmon: reduce unnecessary snprintf.
No need for the snprintf/asprintf dance; use fixed width formats.
Obtained from:NetBSD (CVS rev. 1.8)
MFC after:
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 13:27 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:37:49PM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 12/07/2014 12:34, Bruce Evans wrote:
This joke is bad. The C++ version is worse in every way.
I concur with everything you have said in your message. Moral of
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:31:23AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 13:27 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:37:49PM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 12/07/2014 12:34, Bruce Evans wrote:
This joke is bad. The C++ version is worse in every way.
I
On 12/07/2014 16:31, Ian Lepore wrote:
It is in no way established that any kind of mess exists.
On the contrary, the metrics and analysis which bde@ has presented seem
pretty clear to me.
All we have
is some people who appear to hate C++ expressing their opinions about
how they hate C++.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:35:04PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
Author: mjg
Date: Sat Jul 12 15:35:04 2014
New Revision: 268570
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268570
Log:
Clear nonblock and async on devctl close instaed of open.
This is a purely cosmetic change.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:18:01PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:35:04PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
Author: mjg
Date: Sat Jul 12 15:35:04 2014
New Revision: 268570
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268570
Log:
Clear nonblock and async
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:53:47PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:18:01PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:35:04PM +, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
Author: mjg
Date: Sat Jul 12 15:35:04 2014
New Revision: 268570
URL:
On Jul 12, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
It is in no way established that any kind of mess exists. All we have
is some people who appear to hate C++ expressing their opinions about
how they hate C++. All the whining about how many more bytes the
compiled code is or
==
--- head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sat Jul 12 18:44:47 2014(r268574)
+++ head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sat Jul 12 21:24:28 2014(r268575)
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
# xargs -n1 | sort | uniq -d;
# done
+# 20140712: Removal of bsd.dtrace.mk
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 10 Jul 2014, at 17:29, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
On 10 July 2014 17:23, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's because of the standard library. Examples:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:1454:47: error: unused
Author: jilles
Date: Sat Jul 12 21:54:11 2014
New Revision: 268576
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268576
Log:
sh: Correctly handle positional parameters beyond INT_MAX on 64-bit systems.
Currently, there can be no more than INT_MAX positional parameters. Make
sure to treat
19 matches
Mail list logo
