On 2020-08-26 09:32, Kyle Evans wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:58 AM Roman Bogorodskiy
wrote:
Jamie Gritton wrote:
> Author: jamie
> Date: Wed Aug 26 00:42:59 2020
> New Revision: 364791
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364791
>
> Log:
> Handle jail.conf variables that
On 2018-11-16 16:30, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM James Gritton wrote:
>
> On 2018-11-16 10:34, Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM Jamie Gritton wrote:
> Author: jamie
> Date: Fri May 4 20:54:27 2018
> New Revis
On 2018-11-16 10:34, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM Jamie Gritton wrote:
>
>> Author: jamie
>> Date: Fri May 4 20:54:27 2018
>> New Revision: 333263
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333263
>>
>> Log:
>> Make it easier for filesystems to count themselves
On 2018-11-10 06:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
10.11.2018 19:12, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Usually also jls is the command which will give information (compared
to actions) on jails, would that not fit there?
jls(8) currently does not parse /etc/jail.conf and I'd like to avoid
code duplication
On 2018-08-16 13:58, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On 2018-08-16 13:36, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this
>> case,
>> what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the
>> so-far
>> unreverted files?
>
> Thats a mixed bag,
On 2018-08-16 13:36, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this
case,
what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the
so-far
unreverted files?
Thats a mixed bag, how many files is it, and what would the
commit message before
OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this case,
what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the so-far
unreverted files?
- Jamie
On 2018-08-16 13:27, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Author: jamie
Date: Thu Aug 16 19:09:43 2018
New Revision: 337925
URL:
It turns out I was just about to commit that anyway, so the only
difference is I didn't need to put "(mis)" in the comment :-). ipcs(1)
was prone to allocation errors that I could bypass by rewriting the
sysctls without sbufs.
So false positive, but for the best anyway.
- Jamie
On
That's a big oops on my part - msg and sem had nearly identical logic,
but I got it backwards on shm. I'll put a fix in shortly.
- Jamie
On 2016-04-25 14:28, Subbsd wrote:
I do not know how it works for/in jails, but looks like this breaks
work SHM in host. I've got on any QT-based
On 2016-04-13 17:45, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:14:13PM +, Jamie Gritton wrote:
Author: jamie
Date: Wed Apr 13 20:14:13 2016
New Revision: 297935
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297935
Log:
Separate POSIX sem/shm objects in jails, by prepending the
On 2015-02-06 22:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 18:38, James Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-02-06 19:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
I think you broke the Jenkins tests runs, and potentially jail
support
in some edgecases:
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2
On 2015-02-06 22:31, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 21:27, James Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-02-06 22:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:54, Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
Modified: head/usr.sbin/jail/command.c
On 2015-02-06 22:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 18:38, James Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-02-06 19:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:54, Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: jamie
Date: Fri Feb 6 17:54:53 2015
New Revision: 278323
URL
On 2015-02-06 22:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:54, Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
Modified: head/usr.sbin/jail/command.c
==
--- head/usr.sbin/jail/command.cFri Feb 6 17:43:13 2015
On 2015-02-06 19:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:54, Jamie Gritton ja...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: jamie
Date: Fri Feb 6 17:54:53 2015
New Revision: 278323
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278323
Log:
Add mount.procfs jail parameter, so procfs can be mounted
On 2/4/2014 6:23 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/4/14, 3:40 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2014, at 23:53, Doug Ambrisko ambri...@ambrisko.com wrote:
It's unfortunate that vimage requires jail. I want to use vimage but
not have the security restrictions of a jail. To do this I
On 1/31/2014 5:34 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
It does. I included a warning in jail.8 that this will pretty much
undo jail security. There are still reasons some may want to do
this, but it's definitely not for everyone or even most people.
It
It does. I included a warning in jail.8 that this will pretty much
undo jail security. There are still reasons some may want to do this,
but it's definitely not for everyone or even most people.
- Jamie
On 1/29/2014 6:43 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +,
18 matches
Mail list logo
