Re: svn commit: r207933 - head/sys/cam/scsi

2010-05-12 Thread Scott Long
On May 12, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Ow. No need to be rude :-). > > No, I didn't, why do you ask? > >> Wow, did you copy this from windows? :-) > Actually I'm impressed that someone is using my code. I wrote it on a dare to see just how horrid the linux SG interface really is,

Re: svn commit: r207933 - head/sys/cam/scsi

2010-05-12 Thread Scott Long
On May 12, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 5/12/2010 7:23 AM, Scott Long wrote: >> On May 12, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: >> >>> Ow. No need to be rude :-). >>> >>> No, I didn't, why do you ask? >>

Re: svn commit: r204648 - head/sys/dev/ciss

2010-03-03 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Attila Nagy wrote: >> Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Author: mav >>> Date: Wed Mar 3 17:58:41 2010 >>> New Revision: 204648 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/204648 >>> >>> Log: >>> Several changes to fix livelock under high load, int

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-03 Thread Scott Long
Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing to an NFS destination. I haven't tested all possible permutations of src vs dest filesystems mounting, but I don't see how it can work over any type of NFS mount. What is the reason for forcing this failure? The NO_FSCHG var

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Ed Schouten wrote: * Scott Long wrote: I'd like to re-add the '-' modifier to the chflags command that you removed. Be my guest. As long as it's not done unconditionally. :-) What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Scott Long wrote: >> What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities that >> install themselves with 'chflags schg' do so by unconditionally >> ignoring errors. Chpass seems to be the only ex

svn commit: r204707 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
Author: scottl Date: Thu Mar 4 12:35:20 2010 New Revision: 204707 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/204707 Log: Let the afterinstall target ignore failures from running chflags. This allows it to work over NFS, and puts it back into conformance with other 'schg' utlitilties in the

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: > Scott Long writes: > : Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing > : to an NFS destination. I haven't tested all possible permutations > : of src vs dest filesystem

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <9a8644ad-3b92-4bce-8a51-132f8ea35...@samsco.org> > Scott Long writes: > : On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > > : > In message: > : >Scott Long writes:

Re: svn commit: r205090 - head/sys/dev/bge

2010-03-15 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > Author: yongari > Date: Fri Mar 12 18:18:04 2010 > New Revision: 205090 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205090 > > Log: > Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer > index of status block is read first before ackn