Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: Scott Long writes: : On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <9a8644ad-3b92-4bce-8a51-132f8ea35...@samsco.org> : >Scott Long writes: : > : On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > : > : > In message: : > : >

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <9a8644ad-3b92-4bce-8a51-132f8ea35...@samsco.org> >Scott Long writes: > : On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > > : > In message: > : >Scott Long writes: > : > : Forcing the entire build

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <9a8644ad-3b92-4bce-8a51-132f8ea35...@samsco.org> Scott Long writes: : On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > In message: : >Scott Long writes: : > : Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing : > : to an NFS desti

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:53 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: >Scott Long writes: > : Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing > : to an NFS destination. I haven't tested all possible permutations > : of src vs dest filesystems mounting, but I don't s

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: Scott Long writes: : Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing : to an NFS destination. I haven't tested all possible permutations : of src vs dest filesystems mounting, but I don't see how it can : work over any type of NFS mount. What is the

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Ed Schouten
* Scott Long wrote: > On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > > * Scott Long wrote: > >> What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities that > >> install themselves with 'chflags schg' do so by unconditionally > >> ignoring errors. Chpass seems to be the only exception at

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Scott Long wrote: >> What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities that >> install themselves with 'chflags schg' do so by unconditionally >> ignoring errors. Chpass seems to be the only exception at the >> moment. > > No, I mean,

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Ed Schouten
* Scott Long wrote: > What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities that > install themselves with 'chflags schg' do so by unconditionally > ignoring errors. Chpass seems to be the only exception at the > moment. No, I mean, don't set schg unconditionally. NO_FSCHG should still wo

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Long
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Ed Schouten wrote: * Scott Long wrote: I'd like to re-add the '-' modifier to the chflags command that you removed. Be my guest. As long as it's not done unconditionally. :-) What do you mean by "unconditionally"? Most of the utilities that install themselves with 'ch

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-03 Thread Ed Schouten
* Scott Long wrote: > I'd like to re-add the '-' modifier to the chflags command that you > removed. Be my guest. As long as it's not done unconditionally. :-) Greetings, -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpz0tbYnPoK8.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: svn commit: r194266 - head/usr.bin/chpass

2010-03-03 Thread Scott Long
Forcing the entire build to fail if chflags fails breaks installing to an NFS destination. I haven't tested all possible permutations of src vs dest filesystems mounting, but I don't see how it can work over any type of NFS mount. What is the reason for forcing this failure? The NO_FSCHG var