Bruce,
* Bruce Evans , 20111214 04:26:
> And using inline instead of __inline breaks C90 compilers. Unline const
> and signed, inline is new in C99, and there are still usable C90 compilers
> (e.g., c89, gcc -std=c89 and old(?) versions of TenDRA) which will break
> if it is spelled inline. C90
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
Log:
Replace `inline static' by `static inline'.
If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be
placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace __inline by
inline in the files affected.
No, declaration-spec
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:06:01PM +, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011
> New Revision: 228471
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471
>
> Log:
> Replace `inline static' by `static inline'.
>
> If I interpret the C standard correctly, the stora
Author: ed
Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011
New Revision: 228471
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471
Log:
Replace `inline static' by `static inline'.
If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be
placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace