Hello Bruce,
After reading through your email, I think it's best to fix things using
the following patch. Essentially it does the following:
- It makes sure __alignof() is always present, by defining it as a macro
for GCC 2.95.
- All the C1X macros can now be implemented using the ones we
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello Bruce,
After reading through your email, I think it's best to fix things using
the following patch. Essentially it does the following:
- It makes sure __alignof() is always present, by defining it as a macro
for GCC 2.95.
I tested this with a
Hello Bruce,
* Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au, 20111215 15:12:
The 2 bugs are:
1. Even __offsetof() is broken in the fallback case (that's all cases
where it uses a struct like the above and doesn't use a gccish builtin).
This is because __offsetof() uses size_t, but size_t is not
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello Bruce,
* Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au, 20111215 15:12:
- recently broken for KR since it now uses signed instead of __signed
- broken for longer for KR and C90 since it uses long long. In working
versions, the __int64_t
Author: ed
Date: Wed Dec 14 09:09:37 2011
New Revision: 228495
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228495
Log:
Slightly alter the C1X definitions in in cdefs.h:
- Add _Alignas(). Unfortunately this macro is only partially functional.
The C1X standard will allow both an integer
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Ed Schouten wrote:
Log:
Slightly alter the C1X definitions in in cdefs.h:
- Add _Alignas(). Unfortunately this macro is only partially functional.
The C1X standard will allow both an integer and a type name to be
passed to this macro, while this macro only allows
