On Fri, Mar 02, 2012, David Chisnall wrote:
On 2 Mar 2012, at 12:53, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
This part of the change breaks KBI. I suggest that for merge to stable/9
you would leave the bread and breadn as functions.
Can we not do this for the general case? Provide them as inline
On 7 Apr 2012, at 18:10, David Schultz wrote:
The biggest hinderance to using extern inline is that gcc and C99
disagree about what it means, unless you use a reasonably recent
compiler in C99 mode. I first tried to use extern inline in the
tree several years after I backported gcc's C99
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:45:25PM +, Kirk McKusick wrote:
Author: mckusick
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:45:25 2012
New Revision: 232351
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232351
Modified: head/sys/sys/buf.h
==
On 2 Mar 2012, at 12:53, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
This part of the change breaks KBI. I suggest that for merge to stable/9
you would leave the bread and breadn as functions.
Can we not do this for the general case? Provide them as inline extern
functions in the header, and implement them
Author: mckusick
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:45:25 2012
New Revision: 232351
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232351
Log:
This change avoids a kernel deadlock on snaplk when using
snapshots on UFS filesystems running with journaled soft updates.
This is the first of several bugs that need
