Julian,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 04:46:56PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J Many years ago there was the possibility that malloc M_WAITOK could
J return on shutdown or in some other rare error cases.
J
J Are we certain this is no longer true?
At least it is documented so.
--
Totus tuus,
On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:46:56 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/31/12 4:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Many years ago there was the possibility that malloc M_WAITOK could
return on shutdown or in some other rare error cases.
Are we certain this is no longer true?
That hasn't been true in
On 4/4/12 4:57 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:46:56 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/31/12 4:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Many years ago there was the possibility that malloc M_WAITOK could
return on shutdown or in some other rare error cases.
Are we certain this is no
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 3:32:26 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/4/12 4:57 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:46:56 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/31/12 4:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Many years ago there was the possibility that malloc M_WAITOK could
return on
On 3/31/12 4:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Many years ago there was the possibility that malloc M_WAITOK could
return on shutdown or in some other rare error cases.
Are we certain this is no longer true?
Author: glebius
Date: Sat Mar 31 11:20:48 2012
New Revision: 233745
URL:
Author: glebius
Date: Sat Mar 31 11:20:48 2012
New Revision: 233745
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233745
Log:
Don't check malloc(M_WAITOK) results.
Modified:
head/sys/netinet/ipfw/ip_fw_sockopt.c
Modified: head/sys/netinet/ipfw/ip_fw_sockopt.c
