On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:36:31 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
>POSIX make command lines are executed as if by the shell, and if the
>make implementation wants to optimize by not executing sh for every
>command line, the burden is on it to make it behave the same.
IIRC the man page mentions the exce
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 05:36:03PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:30:02 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
> >I think the most important reason is to reduce special cases. The POSIX
> >developers did not want to create a second subset of utilities that are
> >not available v
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:30:02 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
>I think the most important reason is to reduce special cases. The POSIX
>developers did not want to create a second subset of utilities that are
>not available via execve() (the first subset is the special builtins).
>The burden on imple
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:25:53PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:29:44 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
> >On FreeBSD, the first two statements are partially false. All sh(1)
> >builtins that correspond to utilities specified by POSIX (but not
> >special builtins) have versi
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:29:44 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker writes:
>On FreeBSD, the first two statements are partially false. All sh(1)
>builtins that correspond to utilities specified by POSIX (but not
>special builtins) have versions accessible to execve() (on 8.x and
That's interesting, especially fo
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:35:19PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Hi, sorry about the slow response.
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> >> Author: obrien
> >> Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
> >> New
>> note use of && rather than ; which can be very dangerous
>
>In standard scripts I would agree. In FreeBSD pmake, I would disagree,
>but it seems that it's the odd man out:
Yes, this is because FreeBSD make still uses the shell's -e
for error detection.
NetBSD (hence bmake) abandoned that quite
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Hi, sorry about the slow response.
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
>>On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>> Author: obrien
>>> Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
>>> New Revision:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:19:48 -0400, John Baldwin writes:
>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ beforeinstall:
>> cd ${.CURDIR}; \
>> ${INSTALL} -o ${TMACOWN} -g ${TMACGRP} -m ${TMACMODE} \
>> koi8-r.tmac hyphen.ru ${DESTDIR}${TMACDIR}
>> -cd ${.OBJDIR}
>> +cd ${.OBJDIR};
>
>Isn't thi
Hi, sorry about the slow response.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:49:03 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
>On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> Author: obrien
>> Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
>> New Revision: 238563
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
>>
>> L
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 1:57:43 am David E. O'Brien wrote:
> Author: obrien
> Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
> New Revision: 238563
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
>
> Log:
> a ";" tells make we want the shell to be used
>
> Submitted by: Simon Gerraty
>
> Mo
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:57:43AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> Author: obrien
> Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
> New Revision: 238563
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
>
> Log:
> a ";" tells make we want the shell to be used
>
> Submitted by: Simon Gerraty
>
>
Author: obrien
Date: Wed Jul 18 05:57:42 2012
New Revision: 238563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238563
Log:
a ";" tells make we want the shell to be used
Submitted by: Simon Gerraty
Modified:
head/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac/Makefile
Modified: head/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac/Makef
13 matches
Mail list logo
