Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-06 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/02/2012 20:58, Hiroki Sato wrote: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote in 501af66a.8020...@freebsd.org: do On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: do On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: do do Just

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-06 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/02/2012 22:28, Hiroki Sato wrote: John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za: jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-05 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:17:46PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote in 20120803.124305.1981901625663633450@allbsd.org: hr Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote hr in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com: hr em of course :)

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-03 Thread John Hay
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:28:47PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za: jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-03 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 8/3/12 2:22 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: i just wanted to make sure that there is a way to absolutely make sure that there is no default address selection policy installed. the wide know rule 9 of rfc 3484 is really messing things up for dns-style load balancing. even when ipv6 is not used.

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-03 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Andrey Zonov and...@zonov.org wrote: On 8/3/12 2:22 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: i just wanted to make sure that there is a way to absolutely make sure that there is no default address selection policy installed. the wide know rule 9 of rfc 3484 is really

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote in 201207191536.q6jfabor094...@svn.freebsd.org: em Author: emax em Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012 em New Revision: 238622 em URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622 em em Log: em Allow to specify no source-address-selection policy em em MFC

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote in 201207191536.q6jfabor094...@svn.freebsd.org: em Author: emax em Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012 em New Revision: 238622 em URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622 em

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here? Because the behavior of the script for =NO is to prefer v4. I would like to eliminate yes/no/none keywords in

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here? Because the behavior of the script for =NO is to

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com: em of course :) we have ipv4 systems in production that make use of em getaddrinfo(3) api. when a particular dns name is resolved, and, em multiple A records are returned, the results

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote in 501af66a.8020...@freebsd.org: do On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: do On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: do do Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here? do do Because the behavior of the

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote in 20120803.124305.1981901625663633450@allbsd.org: hr Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote hr in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com: hr hr em of course :) we have ipv4 systems in production that make use of hr em

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread John Hay
While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was from FBSD-4 up to FBSD-8. 9 is a big POLA here. The world is past World IPv6 Launch and I think people expect that if they configure IPv6 addresses, that would be

Re: svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-08-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za: jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was from FBSD-4 jh up to FBSD-8. 9 is a big POLA here. The world is past

svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

2012-07-19 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Author: emax Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012 New Revision: 238622 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622 Log: Allow to specify no source-address-selection policy MFC after:1 week Modified: head/etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl Modified: head/etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl