-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/2012 20:58, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote in
501af66a.8020...@freebsd.org:
do On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: do On Thu, Aug
2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: do do
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/2012 22:28, Hiroki Sato wrote:
John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote
in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za:
jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering
jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:17:46PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20120803.124305.1981901625663633450@allbsd.org:
hr Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote
hr in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com:
hr em of course :)
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:28:47PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote
in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za:
jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering
jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was
On 8/3/12 2:22 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
i just wanted to make sure that there is a way to absolutely make sure
that there is no default address selection policy installed. the wide
know rule 9 of rfc 3484 is really messing things up for dns-style load
balancing. even when ipv6 is not used.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Andrey Zonov and...@zonov.org wrote:
On 8/3/12 2:22 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
i just wanted to make sure that there is a way to absolutely make sure
that there is no default address selection policy installed. the wide
know rule 9 of rfc 3484 is really
Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote
in 201207191536.q6jfabor094...@svn.freebsd.org:
em Author: emax
em Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012
em New Revision: 238622
em URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622
em
em Log:
em Allow to specify no source-address-selection policy
em
em MFC
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote
in 201207191536.q6jfabor094...@svn.freebsd.org:
em Author: emax
em Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012
em New Revision: 238622
em URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622
em
On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here?
Because the behavior of the script for =NO is to prefer v4.
I would
like to eliminate yes/no/none keywords in
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here?
Because the behavior of the script for =NO is to
Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote
in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com:
em of course :) we have ipv4 systems in production that make use of
em getaddrinfo(3) api. when a particular dns name is resolved, and,
em multiple A records are returned, the results
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 501af66a.8020...@freebsd.org:
do On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
do On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
do
do Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here?
do
do Because the behavior of the
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20120803.124305.1981901625663633450@allbsd.org:
hr Maksim Yevmenkin e...@freebsd.org wrote
hr in CAFPOs6pM8qrR72kOtZzO90wYembNrtzw7=ig-nsfudjza7b...@mail.gmail.com:
hr
hr em of course :) we have ipv4 systems in production that make use of
hr em
While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering
IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was from FBSD-4
up to FBSD-8. 9 is a big POLA here. The world is past World IPv6 Launch
and I think people expect that if they configure IPv6 addresses, that
would be
John Hay j...@meraka.org.za wrote
in 20120803042301.ga78...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za:
jh While you guys are here, may I add a request that we go back to prefering
jh IPv6 when IPv6 addresses are enabled. That is the way it was from FBSD-4
jh up to FBSD-8. 9 is a big POLA here. The world is past
Author: emax
Date: Thu Jul 19 15:36:36 2012
New Revision: 238622
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238622
Log:
Allow to specify no source-address-selection policy
MFC after:1 week
Modified:
head/etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl
Modified: head/etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl
16 matches
Mail list logo