On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:16:08PM -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
R> I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking stack).
T
On 26 October 2012 21:16, Rui Paulo wrote:
> I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
> something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
> with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking
> stack). This is aga
I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking stack).
This is against all reasonable software development practices.
So with this change, you've broken building -HEAD net80211 on -9.
Can we please sit down and make this work on both freebsd-9 and
freebsd-head? I do a lot of wifi development on -9 with -HEAD wireless
and this change broke everything for me.
You could've at least asked the maintainers first befor
Author: glebius
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:37:54 2012
New Revision: 241610
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241610
Log:
Make the "struct if_clone" opaque to users of the cloning API. Users
now use function calls:
if_clone_simple()
if_clone_advanced()
to initialize a cloner,
