El 5/30/2014 8:54 AM, Mark Linimon escribió:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:55:46AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I consider this a bug fix; I think ports should already be respecting standards.
Hahahahahahaha
You haven't looked at much ports code, I see :-)
Not lately ;).
Should I consider a
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:55:46AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> I consider this a bug fix; I think ports should already be respecting
> standards.
Hahahahahahaha
You haven't looked at much ports code, I see :-)
> Should I consider a FreeBSD_version bump JIC?
Please.
mcl
_
On 30 May 2014, at 06:18, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Is this going to cause any ports fallout?
It shouldn't do. Any code that compiles on OS X will expect these to be in the
correct place, and since DragonFly applied the fix first we'd hopefully have
found any fallout via dports.
David
Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 00:18, Rui Paulo ha scritto:
> On May 29, 2014, at 18:09, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
>> Author: pfg
>> Date: Fri May 30 01:09:07 2014
>> New Revision: 266865
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266865
>>
>> Log:
>> Fix strcasecmp_l() and strncasecmp
On May 29, 2014, at 18:09, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Author: pfg
> Date: Fri May 30 01:09:07 2014
> New Revision: 266865
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266865
>
> Log:
> Fix strcasecmp_l() and strncasecmp_l() POSIX 2008 compliance.
>
> POSIX.1-2008 specifies that those two fu
Author: pfg
Date: Fri May 30 01:09:07 2014
New Revision: 266865
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266865
Log:
Fix strcasecmp_l() and strncasecmp_l() POSIX 2008 compliance.
POSIX.1-2008 specifies that those two functions should be declared by
including , not (the latter only h
