On 21 Nov 2014, at 23:26, Scott Long scott4l...@yahoo.com wrote:
That’s a good question to look further into. I didn’t see any measurable
differences with this change. I think that the cost of the function call
itself masks the cost of a few extra instructions, but I didn’t test with
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:26:47 -0700 Scott Long scott4l...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:33 PM, Rui Paulo rpa...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 14:11, Scott Long sco...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: scottl
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:11:44 2014
New Revision: 274489
URL:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, David Chisnall wrote:
On 21 Nov 2014, at 23:26, Scott Long scott4l...@yahoo.com wrote:
That?s a good question to look further into. I didn?t see any measurable
differences with this change. I think that the cost of the function call
itself masks the cost of a few
On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:33 PM, Rui Paulo rpa...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 14:11, Scott Long sco...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: scottl
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:11:44 2014
New Revision: 274489
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274489
Log:
Extend earlier addition of stack
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 14:11, Scott Long sco...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: scottl
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:11:44 2014
New Revision: 274489
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274489
Log:
Extend earlier addition of stack frames to most of support.S.
On Nov 13, 2014, at 14:11, Scott Long sco...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: scottl
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:11:44 2014
New Revision: 274489
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274489
Log:
Extend earlier addition of stack frames to most of support.S. This makes
stack traces in KDB,
Author: scottl
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:11:44 2014
New Revision: 274489
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274489
Log:
Extend earlier addition of stack frames to most of support.S. This makes
stack traces in KDB, HWPMC, and DTrace much more reliable and useful.
Reviewed by: kan,
