On 03/08/2015 16:29, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy wrote:
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying to
acquire the spa_namespace_lock. zfskern on the other
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:17:23AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:20:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy wrote:
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying
On 06/08/2015 06:07, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:04:55PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:17:23AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:20:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:04:55PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:17:23AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:20:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:20:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy wrote:
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying to
acquire the spa_namespace_lock. zfskern on the other hand holds the
His proposed solution looks fine to me. Why don't we commit that?
-K
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:17:23AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:20:04PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K.
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy wrote:
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying to
acquire the spa_namespace_lock. zfskern on the other hand holds the
spa_namespace_lock when calling zfs_freebsd_access which in turn
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30/07/2015 10:24, K. Macy wrote:
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying to
acquire the spa_namespace_lock. zfskern on the other hand holds the
spa_namespace_lock
Just FYI this change introduces a deadlock with with the
spa_namespace_lock. Mount will be holding this lock while trying to
acquire the spa_namespace_lock. zfskern on the other hand holds the
spa_namespace_lock when calling zfs_freebsd_access which in turn
tries to acquire the teardown lock.
Author: avg
Date: Thu Jul 2 08:32:02 2015
New Revision: 285021
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285021
Log:
zfs_mount(MS_REMOUNT): protect zfs_(un)register_callbacks calls
We now take z_teardown_lock as a writer to ensure that there is no I/O
while the filesystem state is
10 matches
Mail list logo
