On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:29:50PM -0700, Chris Torek wrote:
> On the other hand, since most C compilers don't bother to trap
> signed integer overflow, but some can, signed integers may behave
> just as badly. :-)
>
> Overall I personally find the rules simpler for unsigned integers
>
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
---
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>>
---
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
--- head/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.cFri May 20 19:46:25 2016
(r300331)
+++ head/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.cFri May 20
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>> --- head/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.cFri May 20 19:46:25 2016
>> (r300331)
>> +++ head/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.cFri May 20 19:50:32 2016
>> (r300332)
>> @@
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Log:
Check for overflow and return EINVAL if detected. Backport this and
r300305 to i386.
PR:209661
Reported and reviewed by: cturt
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 3 days
Modified:
Author: kib
Date: Fri May 20 19:50:32 2016
New Revision: 300332
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300332
Log:
Check for overflow and return EINVAL if detected. Backport this and
r300305 to i386.
PR: 209661
Reported and reviewed by: cturt
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD