On Friday, May 27, 2016, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
>
> > On 28 May 2016, at 00:02 , Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:27:45PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > A> Hm, doesnt this make sense to do as part of RO_RTFREE?
> >
> > I agree that it looks messy, but for now we just need t
> On 28 May 2016, at 00:02 , Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:27:45PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> A> Hm, doesnt this make sense to do as part of RO_RTFREE?
>
> I agree that it looks messy, but for now we just need to fix instapanic.
>
> I will either return to this, or may
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:27:45PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> Hm, doesnt this make sense to do as part of RO_RTFREE?
I agree that it looks messy, but for now we just need to fix instapanic.
I will either return to this, or may be melifaro's new routing will
outperform FLOWTABLE and we can dele
Hm, doesnt this make sense to do as part of RO_RTFREE?
-a
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Author: glebius
Date: Fri May 27 17:31:02 2016
New Revision: 300854
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300854
Log:
Plug route reference underleak that happens with FLOWTABLE after r297225.
Submitted by: Mike Karels
Modified:
head/sys/netinet/ip_output.c
head/sys/netinet6/i
