On October 2, 2016 at 11:52:33 PM, Warner Losh (i...@bsdimp.com) wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to say at the top
#ifndef OFF_MAX
#define OFF_MAX INT64_MAX
#endif
Not sure. The max is just for input checking. We do not even try to deal with
an lseek(2) implementation that doesn’t take a
suggest it for the next C standard? :)
-a
On 2 October 2016 at 23:43, Ed Schouten wrote:
> 2016-10-03 6:00 GMT+02:00 Marcel Moolenaar :
>> Log:
>> Replace OFF_MAX with INT64_MAX. The former is defined on Linux.
>
> Blargh. If only C had
Wouldn't it be better to say at the top
#ifndef OFF_MAX
#define OFF_MAX INT64_MAX
#endif
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> 2016-10-03 6:00 GMT+02:00 Marcel Moolenaar :
>> Log:
>> Replace OFF_MAX with INT64_MAX. The former is defined on
2016-10-03 6:00 GMT+02:00 Marcel Moolenaar :
> Log:
> Replace OFF_MAX with INT64_MAX. The former is defined on Linux.
Blargh. If only C had std::numeric_limits::{min,max}. :-(
--
Ed Schouten
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717
Author: marcel
Date: Mon Oct 3 04:00:30 2016
New Revision: 306622
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306622
Log:
Replace OFF_MAX with INT64_MAX. The former is defined on Linux.
Modified:
head/usr.bin/mkimg/mkimg.c
Modified: head/usr.bin/mkimg/mkimg.c