On 2018-08-16 13:58, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On 2018-08-16 13:36, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this
>> case,
>> what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the
>> so-far
>> unreverted files?
>
> Thats a mixed bag,
> On 2018-08-16 13:36, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >> OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this
> >> case,
> >> what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the
> >> so-far
> >> unreverted files?
> >
> > Thats a mixed bag, how many files is it, and what
On 2018-08-16 13:36, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this
case,
what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the
so-far
unreverted files?
Thats a mixed bag, how many files is it, and what would the
commit message before
> OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this case,
> what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the so-far
> unreverted files?
Thats a mixed bag, how many files is it, and what would the
commit message before for them?
Usually these are seperable
OK, so noted. But seeing as I've already done the partial in this case,
what's best to do now? Should I add another commit to revert the so-far
unreverted files?
- Jamie
On 2018-08-16 13:27, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Author: jamie
Date: Thu Aug 16 19:09:43 2018
New Revision: 337925
URL:
> Author: jamie
> Date: Thu Aug 16 19:09:43 2018
> New Revision: 337925
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337925
>
> Log:
> Revert r337922, except for some documention-only bits. This needs to wait
> until user is changed to stop using jail(2).
Can we please stop doing
Author: jamie
Date: Thu Aug 16 19:09:43 2018
New Revision: 337925
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337925
Log:
Revert r337922, except for some documention-only bits. This needs to wait
until user is changed to stop using jail(2).
Differential Revision:D14791
