Re: Array of objects as a parameter

2016-10-15 Thread Tony Tam
Well, the current 2.0 spec does not allow it. But the in-progress 3.0 spec does > On Oct 15, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Michael Reed wrote: > > Thanks Tony Tam, > > Does that mean that the OpenAPI spec recommends not sending objects in the > query? The alternative is to send two simple arrays where

Re: Array of objects as a parameter

2016-10-15 Thread Michael Reed
Thanks Tony Tam, Does that mean that the OpenAPI spec recommends not sending objects in the query? The alternative is to send two simple arrays where one gives the id values and the other gives the offset values, however, this approach does not seem as intuitive for the user. -- You received

Re: Array of objects as a parameter

2016-10-15 Thread tony tam
Query parameters may not be complex types (type object). > On Oct 15, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Michael Reed wrote: > > Hi, > > I wish c to look like [{id:123,offset:321}, {id:111,offset:222}, ...] but > keep on getting the below error. How do I define an array of objects as a &

Array of objects as a parameter

2016-10-15 Thread Michael Reed
Hi, I wish c to look like [{id:123,offset:321}, {id:111,offset:222}, ...] but keep on getting the below error. How do I define an array of objects as a parameter? Thank you parameters: trendIDs: name: 'c[]' description: Requested trend point ID/offset pairs in: quer