Re: [Swan] IPv6 host-to-host using klips

2015-10-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Erik Andersson wrote: conn mytunnel left=2001:470:dc8c:1000::28:60 right=2001:470:dc8c:1000::28:70 connaddrfamily=ipv6 authby=secret auto=add When I try to bring up the tunnel I get the following output: On host 28:60: [root@vpn-f1 ~]# ipsec auto --up

Re: [Swan] No PARENT proposal selected

2015-10-09 Thread Matt Rogers
> Seems libreswan doesn't load the fw certificate, but it's a little bit > odd because ipsec auto --listall shows all the certs like I expect. I > will retrace my steps to see what I missed. > > Oct 9 10:02:02 fw-kz pluto[30128]: | Added new connection rw-ikev2 with > policy > RSASIG+ENCRYPT+TU

Re: [Swan] No PARENT proposal selected

2015-10-09 Thread Bob Miller
Hi Paul, I am using the new format for the NSS DB sql:/etc/ipsec.d as specified on the wiki, and I have compared my ipsec.conf to the ikev2 one on the wiki as well. Any other suggestions where I might look for the problem? Run with plutodebug=all and see what's going on? Seems libreswan doe

[Swan] IPv6 host-to-host using klips

2015-10-09 Thread Erik Andersson
Hi, Running libreswan 3.15 on Centos 7. I'm trying to setup a host-host tunnel between two IPv6 endpoints on the same subnet. Using the following configuration: config setup protostack=klips interfaces="ipsec0=eth0" conn mytunnel left=2001:470:dc8c:1000::28:60 right=2001:470:

Re: [Swan] No PARENT proposal selected

2015-10-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Bob Miller wrote: I am definitely using machine certificate. I have recreated the CA, firewall, and user cert. I have installed all three certs on the firewall, and the CA has CTu,u,u and the fw and user cert have u,u,u. I have ensured the cert on windows is installed in

Re: [Swan] No PARENT proposal selected

2015-10-09 Thread Bob Miller
Hi Paul, Thanks for the response. I am trying to set up ikev2 with windows road warriors, but I am having an error "No PARENT proposal selected". Is there a clue as to what could be wrong when this message comes up? Probably you are having a mismatched AUTH scheme? You should not use EAP but