Re: [Swan-dev] please fix test nss-cert-crl-03-strict

2018-07-23 Thread Andrew Cagney
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 15:58, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > > > This looks like an improvement compared with the reference logs. Is it? > > > > testing/pluto/nss-cert-crl-03-strict failed west:output-different > > > > testing/pluto/nss-cert-crl-03-strict

Re: [Swan-dev] please look at nss-cert-crl-03-strict

2018-07-23 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:13:22 From: D. Hugh Redelmeier To: Libreswan Development List Subject: [Swan-dev] please look at nss-cert-crl-03-strict An inaccurate message has disappeared. But an accurate message did not replace it. This seems susp

Re: [Swan-dev] please fix test nss-cert-crl-03-strict

2018-07-23 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: This looks like an improvement compared with the reference logs. Is it? testing/pluto/nss-cert-crl-03-strict failed west:output-different testing/pluto/nss-cert-crl-03-strict/OUTPUT/west.console.diff 108 "nss-cert-crl" #1: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3

Re: [Swan-dev] Useful error?

2018-07-23 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: | From: Andrew Cagney | I like the idea but I'm not sure about the error being printed - it | makes me think of a Microsoft joke - while the information provided is | technically correct it is completely useless :-) Better to report an error wher

Re: [Swan-dev] Useful error?

2018-07-23 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: Andrew Cagney | I like the idea but I'm not sure about the error being printed - it | makes me think of a Microsoft joke - while the information provided is | technically correct it is completely useless :-) Better to report an error where it is discovered than hope the null action will

[Swan-dev] feature macros [was Re: puzzled by addcon's use of resolve_defaultroute]

2018-07-23 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: Andrew Cagney | BTW, as a general rule - learnt from autoconf - test for a feature and | not for the OS.. Absolutely. (I learned this from experience, before autoconf. It's nice to learn things from a less painful teacher than experience.) Sometimes code evolution deviates from this.

Re: [Swan-dev] /dev/random slows testing a lot

2018-07-23 Thread Andrew Cagney
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 at 15:15, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> It shouldn’t as the dnssec signatures time out after a few days or so? It > >> should be rerun at the start of a full test run. > > > > The real number is: > > KVM_KEYS_EXPIRATION_DAY = 7 > > f