| From: Andrew Cagney
| On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 03:51, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| >
| > | From: Andrew Cagney
| > It doesn't make sense to initialize a static with an assignment from
| > an object. Amusingly, it does make sense to initialize a static with
| > the address of a compound literal
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 03:51, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
>
> | From: Andrew Cagney
>
> | I'm sure this has come up before - the discussion concluded that a
> | cast within a static initializer probably isn't technically static.
>
> A compound literal starts with what looks like a cast but it isn'
| From: Andrew Cagney
| I'm sure this has come up before - the discussion concluded that a
| cast within a static initializer probably isn't technically static.
A compound literal starts with what looks like a cast but it isn't a
cast.
On the other hand, a compound literal actually creates an
